Let’s suppose that a compliance system costs $12,000 annually. Does that sound pricey?
The answer depends on what it replaces.
If technology can eliminate hundreds of hours repetitive evidence gathering in a complex technology-driven environment, $12,000 could be money well spent. If a seven-person startup could gather the same data by hand in just a few hours each month, the figure appears to be quite different.
It’s a good method to begin the search for Vanta. Identifying the platform with the most advanced features isn’t the first step. Ask your company about how these features will help you save time and money.
The Break-Even Level for Automation
Automation of compliance isn’t necessarily good or bad. The importance of automation for compliance will change as the company expands. Imagine a technology firm that is growing, and has multiple cloud environments, many applications and frequent changes in access. The manual process of gathering evidence can be a major operational burden. Integrations which automatically monitor systems and gather evidence can easily justify their expense.
Imagine a startup of 10 people getting ready to go through the initial SOC 2 audit. It might have a smaller infrastructure, and the documentation of the evidence could be handled without a lot of automation.
That difference matters when evaluating Vanta pricing. A sophisticated platform can provide substantial capabilities, but those capabilities can only provide financial value when an organization actually requires them.
Compare Architecture And Not Just Brands
A search for Vanta vs Drata can quickly become a feature-by-feature exercise. Both platforms are based upon automation and are integrated and therefore, companies seeking this type of approach will benefit from having a look at the frameworks available with their integrations, service, as well as individual quotes and contracts.
There’s a second decision that you must take. Do you want to use an integrated compliance platform at all? Some companies want continuous monitoring and automated collection of evidence. Some businesses prefer to collect evidence on their own, especially if the amount of work remains minimal.
Vanta Competitors Don’t Follow the same model
Many well-known Vanta competitors compete within the same category of automation. There are also platforms that are less heavy that concentrate on organization over the vast system connectivity.
CertAssist fits into this category. Created by compliance experts and internal auditors, CertAssist organizes framework controls in a single workstation, offers editable policies and evidence guidelines, and lets auditors review submitted evidence by gaining access to only read-only.
It does not install agents or connect to infrastructure systems. Customers can upload their own evidence if they want to use.
The system access should be considered. the access to the system.
The elimination of integrations is not without its disadvantages: someone must manually collect evidence.
The application for compliance doesn’t require integration and can be used without any ongoing connections to the operational environment.
Both architectures are equally good. Which tradeoff is right for your company?
CertAssist targets teams between five and 200 members. The price is disclosed rather than needing the salesperson to obtain the initial price. The price for its launch is $225 per month as opposed to the regular cost of $375 per month.
Let Complexity Earn Its Place
What a start-up with 10 employees needs today might differ at 500 or 100 employees.
While compliance is straightforward A lightweight platform could make sense. The costs of automation will increase as systems, employees and frameworks multiply. It’s better to let the complexity of compliance technology take its rightful place.
The cost of purchasing fifty integrations simply because they look great in a table of comparisons is not worth it. Pay for them only if the manual task they replace is the more costly option.